Low-Income Californians Face Oral Health Disparities Despite Insurance

Dentistry Today

0 Shares

Low-income adults in California are less likely to receive timely dental care such as regular checkups and are more likely to visit the dentist for specific problems than those with higher incomes, a fact that holds true for even for low-income residents who have dental insurance, reports the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.

According to the study, 59% of adults with the lowest incomes had seen a dentist within the past year, compared to 80% of higher-income residents. The disparity persisted even for those with private dental insurance, with 75% of the lowest-income adults and 85% of higher-income residents having had a dental visit in the past year.

The study was based on an analysis of 2017 and 2018 data from the center’s California Health Interview Survey, which looked at how disparities in income and insurance may affect adult access to oral healthcare. Those with incomes at or below 138% of the federal poverty level were considered to be in the lowest-income category, while higher-income residents had incomes at or above 250% of the federal poverty level.

Among the lowest-income adults, 64% had public dental insurance through Medi-Cal, 16% had private insurance, and 20% had no insurance at all. While having dental insurance alleviated some disparities for those with the lowest incomes, the type of insurance also appeared to play a role in access, the researchers said.

Those with Medi-Cal, for instance, were less likely than those with private insurance to have visited a dentist in the past six months (41% versus 56%) and were more likely to have seen a dentist for a specific problem (43% versus 31%).

The researchers stressed that dental care and dental insurance aren’t affordable for all Californians. The Affordable Care Act does not consider dental care an essential benefit, many employers do not include dental benefits in their insurance plans, and private dental policies are costly, the researchers said. Also, many dentists don’t participate in Medi-Cal due to lower provider reimbursement levels, the researchers said.

“Our findings indicate that dental insurance improves access to dental care for all, just as the rising tide lifts all boats, but income disparities in access still remain,” said Nadereh Pourat, PhD, lead author of the study and associate director of the center.

“Oral health is an integral part of overall health, and the lowest-income individuals have the least access and suffer the consequences. It is important to break down silos that perpetuate disparities in access to dental care. We can start by promoting parity in dental insurance,” said Pourat.

Among their recommendations, the researchers suggest that policies be established to include dental care as an essential health benefit and to promote the availability of affordable dental insurance options. Other key findings include:

  • 41% of adults in the lowest-income group visited the dentist for specific problems, versus 23% in the higher-income group.
  • 69% of higher-income adults have private health insurance, while only 16% of the lowest-income adults do.
  • 28% of uninsured lowest-income adults saw a dentist in the past six months, compared with 57% of uninsured higher-income residents.

“The study aligns with others that show that individuals with low incomes have fewer checkups and less access to timely care than people in higher income groups,” said Maria Ditter, Dr.med, MPH, coauthor of the study and a research analyst at the center.

“It is evident that we need policies that improve the availability of dental insurance. We need to ensure fair and equitable access to services, regardless of income,” Ditter said.

The researchers noted, however, that the economic effects of the coronavirus pandemic may make enacting these policies and achieving parity challenging.

“These disparities could broaden with the COVID-19 pandemic because of the rising rates of unemployment and loss of employment-based dental insurance,” said Pourat. “The loss of tax revenues will also have a negative impact on coverage, particularly for the lowest-income adults who are Medi-Cal beneficiaries, because Medi-Cal benefits are optional.”

The study, “Despite Insurance, the Poorest Adults Have the Worst Access to Dental Care,” was published by the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.

Related Articles

Tennessee Health Commissioner Tours Dental Clinic

Study to Explore Social Media’s Impact on Oral Health

Ontario to Expand Access to Oral Healthcare for Eligible Seniors